Political deadlock is broken on mere realistic implementation
Link:
http://www.sophanseng.info/2014/07/political-deadlock-is-broken-on-mere-realistic-implementation/

*Preamble:*

[image: deadlock break in cambodia]
<http://www.sophanseng.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/deadlock-break-in-cambodia.jpg>As
Hun Sen walked out from the Senate Building, he spontaneously told the
waiting reporters that “victory, let together help applaud”. Cambodian
people and supporters have posited doubt on what “victory” he mean? The
agreement both parties signed seem show clear road-map bringing into
implementation, but sympathizers see this as “output” not the “outcome” at
all. On the other hand, some articles on the agreement are still vague and
need more time to realistically articulate them. The victory might be
plausible for Hun Sen as he will lead this government legitimately for
another 5 years while Sam Rainsy is feeling relaxed as his 7 MPs-elect and
one activist can walk out the prison as a bail from their unjust pre-trial
detention. The two phenomenon is very dichotomous.

*The doubtful theme of the agreement to breakthrough the deadlock:*

Beside of clear numbers, roles and responsibility for power sharing within
the parliament, the important agendas on National Election Committee (NEC)
in-dept reform and the rescheduling of early election date caused by recent
protests of election flaws, both are not yet written. The agreement just
said they will anticipate with the task force of both parties to work on
it. According to the publicized agreement (in Khmer and translated into
English by KEEN Languages Interpreter)
<http://www.sophanseng.info/2014/07/translation-of-negotiation-agreement-between-cnrp-and-cpp/>,
the current NEC that CNRP has fought vehemently, is still having full
authority to conduct their tasks, and the agreed statement on 4 members of
the NEC selected by the CNRP must go through this current NEC’s mission as
usual before the new NEC body is created. The 9 members of the NEC or the
formula of 4+4+1 will be deliberately applying to all levels such as
provincial and district NEC, or just the top NINE? For the new date of
early election is not mentioned exactly within the agreement as it will
depend on the task force from both sides.

For the power sharing within the parliament, CNRP is expecting to build
rule of law from within the parliament on their insisting demand of “check
and balance” governance by having separate power between Legislative and
Executive. Hence, the agreement doesn’t say anything about Judiciary.
Further more, there are loopholes on those 10 committees especially the
possible inefficient work interaction. For instance, the “investigation,
cleaning-up and anti-corruption” is led by CNRP including many other
committees but not the “Finance”, or “Interior”, or “Public Services” etc.
that will posit difficulty for CNRP to operate their task smoothly. The
most challenging thing for CNRP is probably the limit of human resources.

*The CNRP Leadership:*

The agreement is lacking to mention the proper party name as “The Cambodia
National Rescue Party” by writing only “National Rescue Party” which is a
sign I would like to link to that CNRP cannot isolate itself from their
people (supporters). Thus, the leaders of all levels must work hard to
explain the reasons to join the parliament this time to the people (their
supporters) before those supporters are confused by others. Sam Rainsy who
is the president of the party is seen likely unhappy from this deal. His
first word to the public is we have no option, national reconciliation and
compromise is the most important thing. His speech posited many invisible
meaning for all of us.

He might foresee the long run consequences after CNRP joint the parliament.
He has hugely gained experiences in Cambodian politics especially in
handling with his everlasting rival, Hun Sen.

During this recent decades, I can say Sam Rainsy is a great Khmer leader
who is projecting his new vital leadership to pave a new strong social
fabric of Cambodia. Observers have simultaneously said that Cambodian
social fabric has been so fragile. Violence, corruption and abusing of
power etc. are easily happened by this post-Khmer Rouge  society pattern.
Visionary and long-sighted leader is a leader who comprehend this fragility
and he is pragmatically staying in focus to bring about candid social
fabric for Cambodian people.

As the challenges, Cambodian social fabric is not only referring to the
whole nation, but the biggest fractions such as CNRP party and CPP party.
For Sam Rainsy, CNRP has many thing falling behind especially good flows of
bureaucratic leadership and capable merit-based candidates appointment.
While the party is emerged as the role model for Cambodian people
especially the new aspiration of younger generation, the party-based
candidates and staffs selection is seen not different from the CPP’s. By
unparalleled on finance base and armed forces, the CNRP must ensure that
the party can recruit the best candidates as their agents and can maintain
the increasing people popularity.

By Sophoan Seng

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
  • Polit... S. Sophoan
    • ... 'Papillon Mon' via Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org
      • ... 'KULEN MONOROM' via Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org

Reply via email to