[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=42980#action_42980
]
Hadrian Zbarcea commented on CAMEL-527:
---------------------------------------
fwiw, I don't think moving ServiceSupport and ServiceHelper to oac is a good
idea.
My S101 shows 76 deps from impl->util and 13, from util->impl, so impl should
depend on util I guess. In that case the dependency between ServiceHelper and
ServiceSupport is ok the way it is.
> Break dependency cycle between camel and camel.impl
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-527
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-527
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-core
> Affects Versions: 1.3.0
> Reporter: Christian Schneider
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
> Attachments: servicehelper.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 3 hours
> Remaining Estimate: 3 hours
>
> Currently there is a dependency cycle between camel and camel.impl. While I
> think there is no problem when impl uses camel the other direction should not
> occur. Luckily there ist only one case where this happens. The class
> CamelTemplate from camel uses ServiceSupport from impl.
> As a solution I would suggest to move ServiceSupport and Service to util.
> ServiceHelper is already in util and Service as well as ServiceSupport do not
> need any other classes. This would help to break the dependency cycle and at
> the same time move some classes out of the already quite big camel package.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
