[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43007#action_43007
 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-527:
-----------------------------------

Yes I would leave it as it and remove it in a future release (either Camel 1.5 
or Camel 2.0).

We just need to make sure that we change all the components code as well to use 
ProducerTemplate and not the @deprecated CamelTemplate so when its due time it 
can be safely deleted from the code base.

> Break dependency cycle between camel and camel.impl
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-527
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-527
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.3.0
>            Reporter: Christian Schneider
>            Assignee: Hadrian Zbarcea
>             Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>         Attachments: producertemplate.patch, servicehelper.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 3 hours
>  Remaining Estimate: 3 hours
>
> Currently there is a dependency cycle between camel and camel.impl. While I 
> think there is no problem when impl uses camel the other direction should not 
> occur. Luckily there ist only one case where this happens. The class 
> CamelTemplate from camel uses ServiceSupport from impl. 
> As a solution I would suggest to move ServiceSupport and Service to util. 
> ServiceHelper is already in util and Service as well as ServiceSupport do not 
> need any other classes. This would help to break the dependency cycle and at 
> the same time move some classes out of the already quite big camel package.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to