[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=43318#action_43318
]
Willem Jiang commented on CAMEL-589:
------------------------------------
Hi Claus,
I think the sample you mentioned is the camel-example-spring-jms not jmx.
Am I right?
Willem.
> camel-example-spring-jmx cleanup and improvements
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-589
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-589
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: examples
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> The new sample needed a bit of cleanup so I did some work.
> I added some code comments to assist end-users.
> I also let the broker be configured out-of-the-box in the spring xml instead
> of embedded java code that wasn't best-practice.
> And I added an AOP aspect to act as a kind of audi interceptor on the server
> side to log all the incomming requests. Part of investigation of an
> aspectj-aop autoproxy bug report, that I can not reproduce in trunk.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
