2008/6/23 Gert Vanthienen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > James, > > This would be a good solution for people using Camel with ActiveMQ (and > possibly also for ServiceMix), but isn't Camel supposed to be more > transport/technology-agnostic? If Camel is also intended to be used as a > mediation/routing engine for CXF, MINA, ..., I don't think there is a > single, non-sucky default error handler configuration for all those.
I hear you - but I kinda was thinking, even if folks were using CXF or MINA and not ActiveMQ then at least the default would fail (and act kinda like no error handler?) > Would > it be an option to have no default error handler inside Camel, but let the > underlying system add something non-sucky (with a big WARN message) > implicitly whenever a good default for that system exists and no error > handler was set in the RouteBuilder itself? I guess we could see if there is ActiveMQ available, then default the error handler to DLQ using that; otherwise don't add an error handler? -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://open.iona.com
