Hi Willem

Yes it works with the JMX disabled. BTW: There should be an enable/disable 
methods on CamelContextSupport so you can easier enable/disable it.

java version "1.5.0_11"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_11-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_11-b03, mixed mode, sharing)

-------------------------------------------------------
 T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running org.apache.camel.component.jms.AggregratedJmsRouteTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 13.219 sec

Results :

Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

Med venlig hilsen
 
Claus Ibsen
......................................
Silverbullet
Skovsgårdsvænget 21
8362 Hørning
Tlf. +45 2962 7576
Web: www.silverbullet.dk

-----Original Message-----
From: Willem Jiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 3. juli 2008 07:53
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: AggregratedJmsRouteTest - FAILURE

Hi Claus,

Which version of JDK are you using ?
Can you try to disable the jmx when you run the test by using the below 
code ?

System.setProperty(JmxSystemPropertyKeys.DISABLED, "True");


Willem

Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Something is very strange. I only get the aggregated logging if I run with 
> DEBUG logging. At INFO level the code never reaches the aggregated part.
>
> And still failing with the latest patch.
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>  
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 2. juli 2008 21:54
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: AggregratedJmsRouteTest - FAILURE
>
> Hi Marat
>
> Thanks for the info. I checked, the patch has been applied to the trunk.
> I have not seen the failure on Bamboo yet, so it could be my system only.
>
> Wanted to know if others have the same failure.
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>  
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: marat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 2. juli 2008 21:26
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: AggregratedJmsRouteTest - FAILURE
>
>
> Claus,
>
> See this JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-642
>
> William has already submitted a patch for it. Can you apply this patch and
> see if this solved your problem and get back to us?
>
> Thanks,
> Marat
>
>
> Claus Ibsen wrote:
>   
>> Hi
>>
>>  
>>
>> This unit test constantly fails on my system. Do you have this problem?
>>
>>  
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Test set: org.apache.camel.component.jms.AggregratedJmsRouteTest
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 28.204 sec
>> <<< FAILURE!
>>
>> testJmsMulticastAndAggregration(org.apache.camel.component.jms.AggregratedJmsRouteTest)
>>  
>> Time elapsed: 21.625 sec  <<< ERROR!
>>
>> java.lang.AssertionError: mock:reply Received message count. Expected: <2>
>> but was: <0>
>>
>>             at
>> org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint.fail(MockEndpoint.java:662)
>>
>>             at
>> org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint.assertEquals(MockEndpoint.java:644)
>>
>>             at
>> org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint.assertIsSatisfied(MockEndpoint.java:223)
>>
>>             at
>> org.apache.camel.component.mock.MockEndpoint.assertIsSatisfied(MockEndpoint.java:199)
>>
>>             at
>> org.apache.camel.component.jms.AggregratedJmsRouteTest.testJmsMulticastAndAggregration(AggregratedJmsRouteTest.java:66)
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>>  
>>
>> Med venlig hilsen
>>
>>  
>>
>> Claus Ibsen
>>
>> ......................................
>>
>> Silverbullet
>>
>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>>
>> 8362 Hørning
>>
>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>>
>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>   

Reply via email to