2008/7/3 Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Rock on!
>
> Looks like the JavaScript one was a problem with my syntax? I can't
> say I understand it since my actual JavaScript code uses foo['bar'] to
> access JavaScript hashes or whatever, but if foo('bar') is needed in
> this case, OK. Probably just speaks to my limited knowledge of
> JavaScript. :)
>
> So as I understand the Jython situation now, when writing a Jython
> expression, you must always prefix it with "result = ". I think
> that's a workaround we could document and say it works.
Yeah - I wonder if thats a strange limitation of jython? If so we
should maybe shove the result = part into the internals
Similarly I noticed the ruby stuff needed $ to prefix the variable
names; I wonder if we can avoid that? So they kinda appear as
instance, rather than global variables etc? Not a biggie, just
wondering
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://open.iona.com
