[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=44091#action_44091
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-683:
-----------------------------------
Hi Veit
Yes please open a ticket on the ActiveMQ project if its solely an ActiveMQ
problem.
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ
> Redelivery on a failure doesn't respect the initialRedeliveryDelay on the
> first attempt.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-683
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-683
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-jms
> Affects Versions: 1.4.0
> Environment: Linux, ActiveMQ 5.1, Spring 2.5.x with transacted
> DefaultMessageListenerContainer
> Reporter: Veit Guna
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 1.4.0
>
>
> Hi.
> I'm using ActiveMQ 5.1 together with Spring's DefaultMessageListenerContainer
> to enable MDPs. I'm using the redeliveryPolicy to enable redelivery on
> failures during consumption of a message. ActiveMQ configuration looks like
> this:
> <camelContext id="camel"
> xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring";>
> <route errorHandlerRef="deadLetterErrorHandler">
> <from uri="activemq:NEW" />
> </route>
> </camelContext>
> <bean id="deadLetterErrorHandler"
> class="org.apache.camel.builder.DeadLetterChannelBuilder">
> <property name="redeliveryPolicy" ref="redeliveryPolicyConfig"/>
> </bean>
> <bean id="redeliveryPolicyConfig"
> class="org.apache.camel.processor.RedeliveryPolicy">
> <property name="maximumRedeliveries" value="4"/>
> <property name="initialRedeliveryDelay" value="30000"/>
> <property name="useExponentialBackOff" value="true"/>
> <property name="backOffMultiplier" value="2" />
> </bean>
> Now if a failure occurs, the configured delay isn't used on the first
> redelivery attempt. Instead redelivery takes place immediately after the
> failure occured. This sounds odd to me, since the property is even called
> initialRedeliveryDelay :). I know that maybe this was caused due to the
> following issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1032
> In my opinion immediately redelivery isn't very useful in most cases. If a
> failure occurs, it won't be fixed some ms later :). So my suggestion is (in
> respect to AMQ-1032) to have two options:
> initialRedeliveryDelay
> redeliveryDelay
> So both configurations would be possible. For AMQ-1032 just configure
> initialRedeliveryDelay to 0. Otherwise just take the redeliveryDelay as
> initialRedeliveryDelay to get what I want :).
> Does this make sense?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
