Here is my +1 for moving Camel to TLP and we could mark the camel 2.0 as
a new star point :)
Willem
Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> +1. Before 2.0 is definitely the right time.
>
> Hadrian
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2008, at 9:50 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
>> Yes, I agree, that before 2.0 would be good.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I think Camel has a good and diverse self sustaining community and
>>>> that it should aim to be a TLP now.
>>>> Being a subproject of ActiveMQ is no more relevant imho.
>>>> So I'd like to start writing a proposal that would be submitted to
>>>> the board.
>>>> We would have to come with a project charter, decide what the PMC list
>>>> will be and find a PMC chair.
>>>> Help and feedback welcomed !
>>>
>>> I have been pondering this for a while as well. I think it would be a
>>> very good move for Camel since it's applicable to far more than just
>>> ActiveMQ. One of the first questions I receive when I speak about
>>> Camel is why it is a subproject of ActivMQ and my response is simply
>>> that that's where the project began. I would definitely +1 such a
>>> move, but the question is should we do it now or wait for the 2.0
>>> release? I think such a move should take place before the 2.0 release.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>> --
>>> perl -e 'print
>>> unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
>>> );'
>>>
>>> Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
>>> Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
>>> Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/
>>>
>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Guillaume Nodet
>> ------------------------
>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>> ------------------------
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://fusesource.com
>
>
