This is much clearer and concise. nice. On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 21:08, James Strachan (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > [ > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=48021#action_48021] > > James Strachan commented on CAMEL-1171: > --------------------------------------- > > I was thinking maybe the to() methods could take as a 2nd optional argument > an ExchangePattern - if folks wanted to use the uncommon stuff (RobustInOut > etc). > > then inOnly(uri|endpoint) would be shorthand for to(uri|endpoint, InOnly) > and ditto for inOut(uri|endpoint) > > > > > > add from(....).inOnly("....") or from("...").inOut("....") to allow > explicit ExchangePatterns to be specified in the routing DSL > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Key: CAMEL-1171 > > URL: > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1171 > > Project: Apache Camel > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Reporter: James Strachan > > Assignee: Willem Jiang > > Fix For: 1.5.1, 2.0.0 > > > > > > Right now the *to* will use the current default pattern that an endpoint > prefers. It would be good to allow it to be explicitly specified in the > route. > > Not 100% sure the best names to use - is *inOnly()* and *inOut()* the > best? Maybe *oneway()* and *request()*? > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
