2008/12/19 Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>: > Hi > > I am wondering if our idempotent consumer doesn't fully handle that > fact that some exchanges fails being processed. > If such a failure I was wondering it should not mark the exchange as > been processed. The JPA based idempotent consumer can support this as > it can participate in the TX
Yeah - I wonder for non-transacted exchanges should we use the UnitOfWork to register handlers of things completing/failing? e.g. only deleting a file if the processing completes successfully etc -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
