On 26/09/2007, schlemmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > James, > > Thanks for the response, > > >> I used it since 4 weeks with activemq and the lingo library. > > > >Great! BTW I've been slowly working on integrating most of the Lingo > >library functionality now; so you can use Camel to do custom > >transformations or smart routing, or just use JMS or any other > >transport just as easily as Lingo... > > > >http://activemq.apache.org/camel/bean-integration.html > > > >so eventually, when we've got all the features implemented, Camel > >could be a replacement for Lingo offering more features & being more > >flexible. > > I use some features from the bean component and I think I can kill the > library > on the server side...
Cool! > >> the log for the send message: > >> --- > > >Are you positive thats not just a logging issue. (ActiveMQ only > >deserializes the properties lazily; so they don't necessarily always > >appear in a log statement AFAIK). > > You are right, this is a logging issue. Sorry about that! This one has bitten me once or twice. We should probably fix the logging messages in ActiveMQ to miss that out maybe or something. (The main complexity is the log message is generated using reflection). > I can route with the header. Great! > Apparently I need advanced training in message selectors and headers... :) -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source SOA http://open.iona.com
