James.Strachan wrote: > > The thing is, thats not actually Java without the class declaration > :). To get all the nice IDE completion; we'd need that line inside a > method in a class for a Java IDE. > Agreed! That is one thing that is unique to Camel and a good thing.
James.Strachan wrote: > > We could support just the routing as a DSL in groovy or ruby (I've > kinda started some experiments in that direction in the camel-ruby and > camel-groovy modules). > I am a ruby user but I don't see why i'd want to give up on my autocompletion dsl in java or xml James.Strachan wrote: > > Or we could actually write a real DSL - a very early attempt here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/ide/camel-eclipse/ > > which has little of the actual Antlr grammar there; but at least it > generates a nice text based editor in eclipse :) > Fantastic!! Just the other day I was doodling javacc grammar to represent an integration language that would translate to Camel. Another idea I was twirling around with was using GEF (eclipse project) to graphically edit a route...seems like you have some basics of eclipse plugins going on... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Integration-Patterns-inside-the-ActiveMQ-Message-Broker-tf4569100s22882.html#a13049423 Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
