> > James, or any of the core comitters what is your view of this? Is it > somehow > doable to improve the type conversion framework to support meta parameters > such as encoding. > > It is quite common in integrations to use byte[] and String objects when > passing data around and thus the encoding is important. >
Well, the current lack of support for encodings makes you not trust what Camel does with your data. The type conversion framework is great, but since it's not respecting the encoding of the data, in practice, its like supporting ASCII only. -- /Magnus Heino
