Thanks a lot for the clarification. One more thing , Is it still possible to have multiple route instances (same route) in a clustered ServiceMix for load balancing and for redundancy?
Thanks , Chintaka gnodet wrote: > > I don't think the scenario you describe is doable. Camel does not offer > any > transparent clustering, so if you create a route with multiple steps, all > the steps should be included in a single transaction, so that the whole > route will be rolled back if something bad happens. If the route begins > with a JMS endpoint, you could easily set up persistence, transaction and > all the QoS needed at this point. > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:37 PM, chintaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I am curious to know how camel will behave in the following setting : >> >> 1) You have multiple clusters (A and B) >> 2) Each cluster has a copy of camel route for redundancy and load >> balancing. >> 3) Router in cluster A is executing a routing slip type process(a process >> with multiple steps), at this point if the cluster A goes down router in >> cluster B should pickup the routing ? >> 4) If so what happens to state of the message that router in cluster A >> started executing ? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Chintaka >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Camel-in-a-Clustered-Environment-tp16571337s22882p16571337.html >> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Camel-in-a-Clustered-Environment-tp16571337s22882p16578135.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
