It still strikes me as strange that it's 5X slower that a straight insert. Camel seems to use a lot of CPU to move a message from one place to another. Where is Camel in it's journey toward performance optimization? Are there any tuning suggestions for getting Camel to perform?
James.Strachan wrote: > > Trunk of ActiveMQ with 1.3.0 of Camel should have most of the default > settings to be optional now; its time for a new ActiveMQ release I > think :) > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Camel-Throughput-tp16531762s22882p16624428.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
