I used Eclipse to create my class. Linked the project to
camel-core.....jar. Then deployed (copied) the jar to lib/optional. I
thought that camel scans all jars in there but now I think I may be
mistaken. Should I add my jar to classpath environment variable?
I did not use Maven because I've never worked with it before and I'm
trying to use familiar tools as much as possible.

Vadim.

On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> How do you start your test? We need to know some more about this to be able 
> to help. Camel uses classloading to scan for your class and this can depend 
> in what server you run your tests.
>
>
> Med venlig hilsen
>
> Claus Ibsen
> ......................................
> Silverbullet
> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
> 8362 Hørning
> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vadim Chekan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 7. juli 2008 03:46
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: MS SQL Message Service endpoint
>
> I've set log4j level to TRACE and with camel-1.4 (which has more
> debuging info) I got the following:
> DEBUG ResolverUtil                   - Searching for implementations
> of org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder in packages:
> [org.mycompany.test]
> TRACE ResolverUtil                   - Searching for: is assignable to
> RouteBuilder in package: org/mycompany/test using classloader:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> TRACE ResolverUtil                   - It's not an osgi bundle classloader
> DEBUG ResolverUtil                   - Found: []
>
> What's the deal with osgi?
>
> Vadim.
>
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Good, tutorial helped a little bit.
>> Now I've stuck with this:
>> DEBUG ResolverUtil                   - Searching for implementations
>> of org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder in packages:
>> [org.mycompany.test]
>> DEBUG ResolverUtil                   - Found: []
>>
>> I've compiled and put to lib/optional/MyTest.jar the following code:
>> ========================================================
>> package org.mycompany.test;
>>
>> import org.apache.camel.builder.RouteBuilder;
>>
>> public class Mover1 extends RouteBuilder {
>>        public void configure() throws Exception {
>>                from("messagemq:vadim1").to("messagemq:vadim2");
>>        }
>> }
>> ======================================================
>>
>> Any clues why my class in not found?
>>
>> Vadim.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi Vlad
>>>
>>> Ah you are digging into the auto discovery feature from the <package> tag.
>>> E.g. from the tutorial, where there is a <package> tag in the camel context.
>>>
>>>    <!-- declare a camel context that scans for classes that is RouteBuilder
>>>         in the package org.apache.camel.example.server -->
>>>    <camel:camelContext id="camel">
>>>        <camel:package>org.apache.camel.example.server</camel:package>
>>>        <!-- enable JMX connector so we can connect to the server and browse 
>>> mbeans -->
>>>        <!-- Camel will log at INFO level the service URI to use for 
>>> connecting with jconsole -->
>>>        <camel:jmxAgent id="agent" createConnector="true"/>
>>>    </camel:camelContext>
>>>
>>> Yes it will look for classes in the package that extends RouteBuilder.
>>> The RouteBuilder has a configure() method where you define the camel 
>>> routing in Java DSL.
>>>
>>> You can check out the tutorial:
>>> http://activemq.apache.org/camel/tutorials.html
>>>
>>> So this is a good way to "kick-start" your camel context that its spring 
>>> configured but you can use the Java DSL that is more powerful than XML. 
>>> However Camel supports both, and mix/match.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Med venlig hilsen
>>>
>>> Claus Ibsen
>>> ......................................
>>> Silverbullet
>>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>>> 8362 Hørning
>>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Vadim Chekan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: 4. juli 2008 02:05
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: MS SQL Message Service endpoint
>>>
>>> Thanks Claus,
>>> I'm slowly digging through it.
>>> Following things are still not clear to me:
>>> What are the conventions on classes in the package? Should class
>>> implement main() method to be called? Or any class inherited from
>>> RouteBuilder will be instaniated? I'm trying to understand how camel
>>> decides from "package" which class and method to call.
>>>
>>> Vadim.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Claus Ibsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Created ticket CAMEL-658 for improving the wiki documentation.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting your troubles with it, we want to improve it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Med venlig hilsen
>>>>
>>>> Claus Ibsen
>>>> ......................................
>>>> Silverbullet
>>>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>>>> 8362 Hørning
>>>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>>>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: 3. juli 2008 07:29
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: RE: MS SQL Message Service endpoint
>>>>
>>>> Hi Vlad
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the investigations. Yes there could be an odd issue with the 
>>>> JDBC component, as I would assume it could consume from the database = 
>>>> reading.
>>>>
>>>> As a work around or how to get it working, you can get an endpoint in 
>>>> front to kick it off.
>>>>
>>>> from("timer://kickoff?delay=10000").setBody("select * from 
>>>> xxxx").to("jdbc:msServiceBroker").to("activemq:aspcust1");
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is from a unit test in camel-jdbc. The timer fires every 10th second 
>>>> and queries the database and send the result to the mock. In your case the 
>>>> activemq instead.
>>>>
>>>>                from("timer://kickoff?period=10000").
>>>>                    setBody(constant("select * from customer")).
>>>>                    to("jdbc:testdb").
>>>>                    to("mock:result");
>>>>
>>>> Notice that the result is a list of map objects, each row is a map with 
>>>> the columnname as the key. From another unit test:
>>>>
>>>>        // assertions of the response
>>>>        assertNotNull(out);
>>>>        assertNotNull(out.getOut());
>>>>        ArrayList<HashMap<String, Object>> data = 
>>>> out.getOut().getBody(ArrayList.class);
>>>>        assertNotNull("out body could not be converted to an ArrayList - 
>>>> was: "
>>>>            + out.getOut().getBody(), data);
>>>>        assertEquals(2, data.size());
>>>>        HashMap<String, Object> row = data.get(0);
>>>>        assertEquals("cust1", row.get("ID"));
>>>>        assertEquals("jstrachan", row.get("NAME"));
>>>>        row = data.get(1);
>>>>        assertEquals("cust2", row.get("ID"));
>>>>        assertEquals("nsandhu", row.get("NAME"));
>>>>
>>>> Med venlig hilsen
>>>>
>>>> Claus Ibsen
>>>> ......................................
>>>> Silverbullet
>>>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>>>> 8362 Hørning
>>>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>>>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Vadim Chekan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: 3. juli 2008 01:33
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: MS SQL Message Service endpoint
>>>>
>>>> Ok, I got this one. My ActiveMQ installation does not contain 
>>>> camel-jdbc.jar.
>>>> It runs fine now but it gives me "Failed to execute main task. Reason:
>>>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>> org/springframework/aop/support/AopUtils".
>>>> Copied spring-aop-2.5.1.jar
>>>>
>>>> Ok, now:
>>>> Caused by: org.apache.camel.RuntimeCamelException: A JDBC Consumer would 
>>>> be the
>>>> server side of database! No such support here at
>>>> org.apache.camel.component.jdbc.JdbcEndpoint.createConsumer(JdbcEndpoint.java:56)
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, I remember seeing this exception in the source code but I do not
>>>> understand it. why <from uri="jdbc:msServiceBroker" /> tries to create
>>>> a consumer. I thought that "from" is a message producer, right?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Vadim Chekan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> Here is my progress:
>>>>> First of all it complained about DriverManagerDataSource class so I've
>>>>> downloaded spring-jdbc-2.5.1.jar and put it to lib/optional
>>>>> Now I'm getting
>>>>> =======================================
>>>>> Caused by: org.apache.camel.NoSuchEndpointException: No endpoint could be 
>>>>> found
>>>>> for: jdbc:msServiceBroker
>>>>>        at 
>>>>> org.apache.camel.util.CamelContextHelper.getMandatoryEndpoint(CamelCo
>>>>> =======================================
>>>>>
>>>>> My configuration is:
>>>>> ===============================================================
>>>>>   <camelContext id="camel"
>>>>> xmlns="http://activemq.apache.org/camel/schema/spring";>
>>>>>           <route>
>>>>>                   <from uri="jdbc:msServiceBroker" />
>>>>>                   <to uri="activemq:aspcust1" />
>>>>>           </route>
>>>>>   </camelContext>
>>>>>
>>>>>        <bean id="msServiceBroker"
>>>>> class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
>>>>>                <property name="driverClassName" 
>>>>> value="net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.Driver"/>
>>>>>                <property name="url"
>>>>> value="jdbc:jtds:sqlserver://aspcust1/LogQueue;instance=main"/>
>>>>>                <property name="username" value="****"/>
>>>>>                <property name="password" value="****"/>
>>>>>        </bean>
>>>>> ===============================================================
>>>>>
>>>>> I thought that it it the way this thing works: after jdbc uri you
>>>>> specify a bean, but apparently I got it wrong. I'm trying to define
>>>>> endpoint explicitly now withing camel context.
>>>>> Any help please?
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW: there is an error in schema location in default configuration
>>>>> file: http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core.xsd does
>>>>> not exist. I had to change it to
>>>>> http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.1.0.xsd to make
>>>>> my Visual Studio hints working ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
>>>>> is explicitly specified
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
>>>> is explicitly specified
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
>>> is explicitly specified
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
>> is explicitly specified
>>
>
>
>
> --
> From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
> is explicitly specified
>



-- 
>From RFC 2631: In ASN.1, EXPLICIT tagging is implicit unless IMPLICIT
is explicitly specified

Reply via email to