You are correct here Claus, using the parameter: <property name="transportType"> <util:constant static-field="com.ibm.mq.jms.JMSC.MQJMS_CLIENT_NONJMS_MQ"/> </property>
seems to make no difference at all and we should remove it. Instead we tried using: <property name="transportType" value="1" /> This unfortunately didn’t have an effect on the result. Taking a dive into servicemix-jms is the next step for sure here! This might reveal some answers. >From what I understand camel JMS is based on org.springframework.jms.core.JmsTemplate? We could perhaps make use of this? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bridging-the-ActiveMQ-with-IBM-Websphere-using-Camel-tp19623329s22882p19833403.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
