Hi Tim,

I just added some comment on the JIRA CAMLE-1074, please check them out.

Willem
mcnamara wrote:
> Added  https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1074 CAMEL-1074 
> 
> Thanks
> Tim...
> 
> 
> 
> willem.jiang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can you fill a JIRA[1] and submit your test case ? so we can dig the
>> real reason.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL
>>
>> Willem
>>
>> mcnamara wrote:
>>> Perusing the JAXB RI documentation, it appears the either ObjectFactory
>>> or
>>> jaxb.index is required.  In my case, xjc did generate ObjectFactory but
>>> not
>>> jaxb.index.  Apparently, jaxb.index is generated when going from
>>> java->xsd
>>> but not xsd->java
>>>
>>> Placing jaxb.index in com/foo/bar yielded the same result - I checked
>>> that
>>> jaxb.index file is indeed being read by putting a non-existent class name
>>> in
>>> the file, and there was an error.
>>>
>>> When rolling my own unmarshal code, a call to JAXBElement.getValue() was
>>> required.
>>>
>>> Note this is java 1.5 and using the jaxb jars packaged with camel.
>>>
>>>
>>> Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Maybe the jaxb.index stuff is something we should document on the camel
>>>> wiki for the JAXB dataformat as a kind of reminder.
>>>>
>>>> Is jaxb.index always needed? 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Med venlig hilsen
>>>>  
>>>> Claus Ibsen
>>>> ......................................
>>>> Silverbullet
>>>> Skovsgårdsvænget 21
>>>> 8362 Hørning
>>>> Tlf. +45 2962 7576
>>>> Web: www.silverbullet.dk
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Willem Jiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>>>> Sent: 10. november 2008 04:57
>>>> To: camel-user@activemq.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: JAXB unmarshal
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Did you put the jaxb.index file into the "com.foo.bar" directory?
>>>>
>>>> Willem
>>>>
>>>> mcnamara wrote:
>>>>> using .unmarshal(new JaxbDataFormat("com.foo.bar") is returning a
>>>>> JAXBElement
>>>>> instead of the desired object that was generated by xjc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've looked at UnmarshalTest, and cannot account for the discrepancy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any insight would be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim...
>>>>
>>
>>
> 

Reply via email to