I believe the flicker that Mr. Adams referred to was the start up
flicker when the enlarger is turned on. The older bulb/ballast
combination could/would/did ignite and quit several times before they
would stabilize, effectivly reducing your $300 digital timer accurate to
1 millisecond to being a paperweight. The paper probably does not
realize it is getting 120 light pulses per second - the idea of using DC
is interesting, though. That may help stabilize the lumen output of the
lamp as it would warm up quicker. If you are using a variable contrast
paper, think about the color spectrum of the lamp you select - you may
find that printing grade 5 to be impossible

> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:19:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Matt Mengel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Cameramakers] Speed Graphic Enlarger
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Ron,
>  I know someone who does neon (I think). Are the green
> and blue to work with variable contrast papers? Why
> couldn't I use a standard enlarger bulb (or bulbs) and
> space them evenly over some diffused glass? Not even
> enough distibution?
>                         Stabbing in the dark,
>                                    Matt
> 
> 
> --- Ron Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Matt
> > I believe that most modern cold lights use a form of
> > neon tubes in lew of
> > florescent tubes. I have owned both a regular cold
> > light from Zone VI and
> > there variable contrast head with the blue and green
> > tubes. I have thought
> > many times about stopping at the neon sign
> > manufacturing business here in
> > the town I live in but haven't gotten around to it.
> > Ron
> > www.ronbakerphotography.com
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matt Mengel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Cameramakers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:20 AM
> > Subject: [Cameramakers] Speed Graphic Enlarger
> >
> >
> > > Thanks everyone on the suggestions for the Graflok
> > > back. In Ansel Adams' book "The Negative" he has
> > > drawings of a homemade diffuser enlarger using
> > anti
> > > flicker "special" flourescent tubes as a light
> > source.
> > > Anyone have any info on something like this? The
> > book
> > > has a good diagram but not much detail on
> > > construction.
> > > I'd like to make the stuff myself as opposed to
> > buying
> > > a cold light. But it's good to have the Graflok
> > thing
> > > to fall back on. Would a good light box be a good
> > > starting point? For parts that is.
> > >                             Cheers,
> > >                                Matt
> > >
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 4
> From: "Ron Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cameramakers] Speed Graphic Enlarger
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:51:11 -0500
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Hi Matt
> Probably any light source will work but you have to keep in mind the heat
> factor. You will want to keep everything as cooool as possible.
> Ron
> I prefer using a dicro head with the yellow and magenta filters this will
> allow me to do color if I choose to. You can pick up an old Beseler DG color
> head very reasonable ,$100 -$200.. I like the DG head because the cooling
> fan is separate from the light head it's self.
> 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Matt Mengel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Cameramakers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:20 AM
> > > Subject: [Cameramakers] Speed Graphic Enlarger
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thanks everyone on the suggestions for the Graflok
> > > > back. In Ansel Adams' book "The Negative" he has
> > > > drawings of a homemade diffuser enlarger using
> > > anti
> > > > flicker "special" flourescent tubes as a light
> > > source.
> > > > Anyone have any info on something like this? The
> > > book
> > > > has a good diagram but not much detail on
> > > > construction.
> > > > I'd like to make the stuff myself as opposed to
> > > buying
> > > > a cold light. But it's good to have the Graflok
> > > thing
> > > > to fall back on. Would a good light box be a good
> > > > starting point? For parts that is.
> > > >                             Cheers,
> > > >                                Matt
> > > >
 --__--__--
> 
> Message: 6
> From: "ken watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:34:48 -0600
> Subject: [Cameramakers] RE: Cameramakers digest, Vol 1 #132
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thanks everyone on the suggestions for the Graflok
> back. ... anti
> flicker "special" flourescent tubes
> 
> I do not know for certain but I would bet if you had a dual power supply to
> the lamps you could stop the flicker. Flickering is caused as the current
> changes direction inside the tubes. You need AC power to strike the arc but
> once it is going DC would do the trick.
> As a suggestion get 300V caps and feed them rectified AC ( pulsating DC )
> from the power line with a diode ( 1 KV rating might be required)  in series
> with the output of these caps connect them in parallel to the same AC
> connections to your lamps. By having a switch for the AC side and DC side,
> once the bulbs were lit off you could switch off the AC power stopping most
> or all the flickering.  Caps for this might be cheapest from someone who
> supplies them for motor starting. Using 'AC" caps vs DC would be an OK
> substitution and keep things from getting exciting if the DC caps were
> installed backwards. Keep everything "unplugged" until you are finished
> wiring everything.
> Of course if you REALLY wired things wrong there are circuit breakers. Also,
> for real, this could lead to a dangerous situation where, if things were
> wired incorrectly, you could place the "wrong " side of the AC line to the
> fixtures. So make sure they ( the fixtures) are grounded and find a GFI plug
> for your first test.
> If you have no idea of what I am talking about do nothing. Or find an
> electrical or electronic engineer friend to figure things out .
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 7
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 19:16:25 EDT
> Subject: Re: [Cameramakers] Speed Graphic Enlarger
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> --part1_d3.162c141e.28594e49_boundary
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> Hi Matt,
>  I think your on the right track with the multiple lights and the diffusing
> material. I tried a piece of lexan under the condensors of my D5 and it did
> work giving a nice diffuse light source,but the light output was reduced
> dramatically and made the exposures longer than necessary. I tried a higher
> wattage lamp but  then this smell of burning appeared so I gave that up. I
> have thought about using one of those 200 watt long life fluorescent bulbs.
> I also had another idea thanks to a neighbour who installed one of those
> outdoor mercury vapour lamps it kinda looks like an enlarger lamp housing and
> by the light it puts out bright enough,maybe you could check one of these out
> at a d.i.y place. My final idea( but not sure of the power aspects of it)
> would be to use the halogen lamps from car headlights ,maybe you could obtain
> a couple of volvo headlights  and place some opal glass in front or make a
> mixing box and bounce the light onto the  diffusing bit. you would need a
> power supply for the 12v but the lamps are cheap. Also along this idea what
> about those searchlights used for hunting they maybe bright enough.
> hope this helps some and let us know how your experiments go
> Regards
> Andy
>
_______________________________________________
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers

Reply via email to