re: bellows chat, Aerial film contrast

1. Bellows support. Manufacturers have done it in one of two ways. a small
rigid support on the bottom that is attached to the rail, and a snap
connection that holds together several inches of bellows (basically the
amount your lens would require for close-up that you normally don't use.)
A bellows doesn't need much to support it. A little lift from the top or a
little push from the bottom.

2. Other possibilities: New materials. bungicord on the top between the
standards--just enough tension to lift the bellows sag without distorting
the standards.

3. The Deardorf bellows folding within bellows. It's not all that tricky and
its not a bag bellows. Its a bellows that has a bulge such that the smaller
cross section can squeeze past the larger dimension part. This gives it a
little more support.

4. Internal reflection and dryer vent.
A dryer vent type material might work. I think the idea has real merit. In
fact rather than try to tweak some existing materials just get some spring
wire wind it into a nice diameter and then glue two pieces of black fabric
inside and outside the 'spring' cylinder. An advanced design might square
off the corners.

5. Internal reflection. It should be added that it's not just light tight
matte black that is needed inside your camera. The folds in the bellows are
part of the 'light trap.' Even black fabric will reflect enough light to fog
film if it is stretched flat such that the angle of incidence from lens
spill equals the angle of refraction hitting your film plane. Real world? If
your bellows is always stretched straight out to the limit you risk this.

6. Lens Shade. 5x7 with a reducing back--interesting idea. With three 4x5s
it's a little late for me to change now and my Horseman 8x10 is too durned
heavy to be carting around on my shoulder. I've found that it is far more
important to keep stray light off the lens to keep light spill from fogging
the film. Get a lens shade or a bellows or at least shade your lens from the
sun or light source, or the sky with the dark slide while exposing. It
really does help. You might not even notice it until you shoot two sheets of
film of the same subject one with a shade and one without.

7. Aerial film and contrast. Sounds like the film test with detail-less
ground areas and dense skies is a problem caused by the 'solution' needed
for aerial photography.
One of the biggest problems in aerial photography is getting enough
contrast. Kodak trys to engineer increased contrast into the film. Try low
contrast developers, fogging the film (pre or post amount to the same
thing).
If I was playing with that film I would (1) try to establish an ISO for the
shadows and then (2) find what the minimum process time is for PMK Pyro
(that I use) and then (3) shoot a test & give it a minute or two over the
minimal PMK time. 

8. Pre and post fogging can also help your shadows and lower the contrast of
your aerial film.  For transparency film-the most critical test-I will keep
the camera focused on the subject or re-focus it at infinity and then shoot
a white card 3 1/2 to 4 stops underexposed. The card being too clase to
focus provides exposure without detail. I meter with a spot meter from the
camera position and then stop down. e.g. f8 at 1/60 shoot f16.5 at 1 1/125.
With negative film start here and then go farther until you fog it badly.
Pre/post fogging (also called 'flashing') adds density to the shadows
without affecting the highlights. With color transparency film it'll add
just enough exposure to the dark areas to pick up texture. Overall it also
lowers contrast. 

9. Pre/Post fogging and B&W negative. Usually you don't need to do this with
negative film. Just fiddle with the contrast while printing. Sometimes I'll
post-flash the film if I've processed some film and the shadows are weak by
just a hair. Also I haven't seen a bit of difference between pre and post
fogging. The literature (adults like Ctein doing tests) supports this. I
would think that reciprocity sensitive films like Polaroid Type 55 would
show a problem with pre or post before any other type of film. With
transparency film I shoot of paintings--very critical color corrections--I
can post flash days later and use these numbers as pre & post flash exposure
the next time I shoot film with no change in results.

As always your mileage may vary.

Will

---William Nettles 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nettles Photo / Imaging Site  http://www.wgn.net/~nettles

_______________________________________________
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers

Reply via email to