> what are these purposes?
An exercise in being downright contrary. I could tell you. But you'd laugh.

> Would it be easier just to buy a pellicle-mirroed
> camera body such as the EOS RT , and use adaptors to
> get the lenses you want on?
Easier, maybe. But not really what I'm aiming for. I can't afford or justify
an EOS RT. I'm just a student who dabbles in photography and occasionally
likes to do things a bit differently.

OK, I'll risk being an object of mockery: the camera in question is an old
Zenit. I bought it to have a camera I could take places I wouldn't risk
anything I cared about - dark alleys at night, abandoned buildings. It's not
a piece of equipment I take terribly seriously.

I had to open it up to fix a fault (wind lever started jamming - turned out
the previous owner had managed to get sand in it. Such is life, especially
on eBay). As I did so, it began to dawn on me that there's actually a quite
nice camera hiding inside there. It's buried pretty deep, but it is there.
So I thought I'd start a little project to dig that nice camera out.

The Zenit jumps when fired. No, that's an understatement; it kicks. Not just
ordinary SLR bounce, but really seriously. Normally the blame is partly the
mirror's, partly the shutter's -but here, the shutter (one of the old
leica-type designs with cloth blinds) is actually very soft (when correctly
adjusted - most aren't); all the bounce is in the mirror. Wedge the mirror
up and it's softer than an SLR with mirror lock; a rangefindery feel. Never
thought I'd describe something about a Zenit as "wonderful", but... it is
there. Those Russian engineers just hid it deep.

The Zenit's 70% (not a typo) viewfinder coverage is pretty lousy, though.
Fortunately the mirror, mirror raising lever and finder screen come out as a
single unit. I intend to replace this unit with a slab of pellicle mirror
and a much brighter, full-frame screen I found in a bargain bin. There's
plenty of room in there for a big enough mirror to get an actual size view,
and the extra screen brightness should help make up for the dimness of the
partial mirror. Getting it in the right place for correct focus will
doubtless be a pain, but I'm sure I can do it with patience.

I have no intention of bolting the prism back on. It's big and heavy on a
camera that really doesn't need any more weight or size, and it imposes a
dirty green line down the centre of the view. Without that and without the
lightmeter (which isn't up to much anyway), I can saw most of the top plate
down and have an appreciably smaller camera. Reckon it shouldn't be too hard
to build or scrounge some doors to cover the finder screen - I like waist
level finders anyhow.

> Edmund Scientific sells Pellicle mirrors, I think,
> but they'll have to be ordered from out of the UK.

Thanks for the info. Looks like they have some fun stuff.

 - Lester.
_______________________________________________
Cameramakers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmp.opusis.com/mailman/listinfo/cameramakers

Reply via email to