I will second that.  It definitely feels snappier (10.3.6 here).  It
seems to make *everything* feel faster (aside from these bloody text
boxes - they feel the same).  Well done.


On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:08:06 +0100, Ralph Scheuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geoff,
> 
> I have downloaded and tested the CFMessage version and I would also
> like to say that it "feels" much better. Switching between various tabs
> while they are loading is now possible for me (with the last nightlies
> that I have tested, this was almost impossible).
> 
> In general, I have the impression that the user has a lot more control
> over the browser while it is busy which makes it "feel" a lot snappier.
> I will keep testing this tonight and see if I find anything I don't
> like about it. You won't get any real benchmarks from me right now,
> just my subjective impressions...
> 
> Until now, this looks promising.
> 
> Ralph Scheuer
> 
> Am 21.11.2004 um 18:37 schrieb Geoff Beier:
> 
> 
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > In the past we've speculated that the way Camino handles gecko events
> > may be
> > responsible for some of the various performance issues people report
> > with
> > Camino. This includes but is not limited to CPU usage during flash
> > playback.
> >
> > I've got a patch up:
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=271050
> >
> > which drastically changes how gecko events are dispatched. Because
> > this code
> > is invoked so frequently and the change is so dramatic, I need a lot of
> > testing before this will sound like a good idea :-).
> >
> > It would help out a lot if as many folks as possible could either
> > build and
> > test or download the disk image here:
> > http://www.speakeasy.org/~gbeier/Camino-perftest.dmg.bz2
> >
> > and browse with the two builds included there. The one in the "Old
> > event
> > handling" folder should be very similar to tonight's nightly. The only
> > difference between that one and the one in the "New event handling"
> > folder
> > is the above patch; this should make it easily to isolate performance
> > differences introduced by this change.
> >
> > Anyone who gets to kick it around, please report results back either
> > to this
> > list or on the bug itself.
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Geoff
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Camino mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Camino mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
>
_______________________________________________
Camino mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino

Reply via email to