Yes, their Flash detection is very bad. It only "detects" versions 3
through 7, and the way they do it is horrible. (Whoever wrote that
needs to learn some basic regex-fu.)
On Jul 14, 2006, at 23:30, Denise Kruse wrote:
Thank you! Rick James was funky in a good way; alas, his site is
funky in a bad way. The only other question is whether or not it
will work on a PC. I'll try that on Monday. But you have
completely answered my original query.
On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Peter Yang wrote:
I just tried it with Opera 9.0, a Camino optimized nightly build,
Safari,
Internet Explorer 5.2 and Firefox 1.5.0.4 and got the same error
on all of
them. Methinks their Flash detection is funky.
-Peter
On 7/15/06, Denise Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I noticed that there is a beta Flash Player that is supposed to
work with Intel chip models but, as stated, mine is not Intel.
Thanks anyway.
On Jul 14, 2006, at 8:48 PM, Michael Watson wrote:
> Oh, crap. Sorry. I saw "Intel" but not the rest of the sentence.
>
> Ignore me.
>
>
>
> On 14 Jul, 2006, at 23:40, Denise Kruse wrote:
>
>> I have downloaded the latest Flash Player 9 for OS X running
>> 10.4.7 G5 (no Intel chip). It says it is installed. However,
why
>> do some sites continue to tell me that it needs to be installed?
>> Example: http://www.rickjames.com/index-no_flash.php
>> It's not just Camino; I also get the message with Safari. Since
>> so many other sites requiring Flash work well, I am wondering if
>> the problem is with the site rather than my browser. Any
>> thoughts? Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Camino mailing list
[email protected]
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
