What you say is true enough, but, frankly, I see no other incentive for clicking zoom on fluid layouts than wishing it to go full-screen. There is just no point to it otherwise, I think.
Sebastian On 17.11.2006, at 13:17, Noemi wrote: > > Personally, I think fit-to-content is more important for fluid > layouts than for fixed-width (although how one determines what fit-to- > content is for a fluid layout is beyond me). But zooming to full > screen on a fluid layout is a nightmare. Long line lengths are very > difficult to read (there's plenty of research out there to support > this), and most fluid layouts don't limit them. It's extremely > difficult to read a maximized fluid-layout page at any resolution > higher than 1024x768. At 1600x1000, it's impossible. > > Just my 2c. > > -Noemi > > > On Nov 17, 2006, at 7:43 AM, Sebastian Winkler wrote: > >> Finally, in the latest branch build, Camino has taken to exhibit the >> mac-typical window-zoom: fit-to-contant rather that full-screen. >> A true milestone! >> >> I must say though, that for not fixed-width layouts (pages that >> reflow the contents according to window-width) the full-screen >> behaviour would seem to be the only sensible thing. Wouldn't a hybrid >> approach, depending on the nature of the page, be the best solution? >> Also, right now zooming a window with a frameset doesn't seem to >> avail to anything (though sometimes Camino takes to augmenting the >> window-width for approx. 20px per click) >> >> Regards to all, >> Sebastian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Camino mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino > > _______________________________________________ > Camino mailing list > [email protected] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino _______________________________________________ Camino mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
