On 03/07/2012 11:37 PM, Edgar Friendly wrote:
[...]
>
Except I don't intend odb to scale. It's hovering right around 500 lines of code, and if I can keep it around that size, I'll be happy. I don't intend odb to ever have a `odb remove foo` command
Hi, Wouldn't it be possible to have 'odb remove foo' just call 'ocamlfind remove foo'? Regards, F. > nor an `odb update`.
Maybe I'll have an `odb upgrade`, but I'm happy leaving this as `odb --upgrade`. Odb's goal is to be an 80% solution, and it was that a while ago, I think. It's approaching 90%, and I'm going to try to avoid it feature creeping to 100%. Oddities should be handled by the package installers themselves or the metadata repository as much as possible, leaving pretty little work for odb. E.
-- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
