On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Daniel Bünzli <[email protected]>wrote:
> Thanks for all the links. > > > Beware that all those projects tend to be built as patches to the > > ocaml distribution, which means difficult deployment (which means few > > users, which means few maintenance, which means bitrot). > > That's the problem. I tend not to rely too much beyond what is > provided by the standard distribution. > > > You may also have a look at the various attempts at integrating OCaml > with Java IDEs (Oca'IDE, Ocaml Development Tools, etc.). > > Well I'm really not fond of IDEs. I usually find them very invasive > and bureaucratic and I'm not productive in them. So far emacs is the > only system that works really well for me (it's also an "IDE" that > works everywhere, even in the terminal). But I have to admit that some > IDEs provide features that I would like to have in the emacs modes I > use. > OCamlspotter as well as the tools that OCamlPro is working on should work fine from within vim and emacs. y -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
