Thanks, I guess I'll recompile then. I notice, though, that there's a libcamlrun_shared.so (for the bytecode runtime). Is there any reason we don't also get libasmrun_shared.so by default?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Jeff Meister <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, you should recompile OCaml with -fPIC. I ran into the same problem a > few months ago, and noticed this bit of information in the INSTALL file: > > On a Linux x86/64 bits host, to build the run-time system in PIC mode > (enables putting the runtime in a shared library, > at a small performance cost): > ./configure -cc "gcc -fPIC" -aspp "gcc -c -fPIC" > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Alex Rubinsteyn < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to package up some OCaml code (along with C bindings) as a >> shared library. However, I'm encountering the following linker error: >> >> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun.a(startup.o): relocation >> R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared >> object; recompile with -fPIC >> /usr/lib/ocaml/libasmrun.a: could not read symbols: Bad value >> >> Do I have to recompile OCaml with -fPIC to put the runtime inside a >> shared library? >> >> >> > -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
