Foot in mouth. The manual says yes.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Joel Reymont <joe...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's quite a bit of code involved in each call to caml_named_value. > > This includes calling hash_value_name, traversal of the named value > list and a call strcmp for every step of the traversal. > > Is it sensible to cache the valued returned by caml_named_value and > sticking it into an array of closures? > > The array (block) would be registered as global root. > > My use case is caml_named_value being called several times a second, > potentially. > > Thanks, Joel > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Working on AlgoKit, a new algorithmic trading platform using Rithmic R|API > ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- > http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont > ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Working on AlgoKit, a new algorithmic trading platform using Rithmic R|API ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont ---------------------+------------+--------------------------------------- -- Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
