On Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:31:37 -0700, Michael Vanier wrote: > > Do you know if there is any performance cost to using e.g. U.f > instead of Unix.f? I wouldn't think so.
The generated assembly code (ocamlopt -S) is not exactly the same but my take is that the speed difference, if any, is negligible. Regards, ChriS _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
