> I thought of reading through the code and maybe contributing, but the fact > that it's all in C++ is holding me back a bit. Still, I'm going to take a > look once I have time. > Actually, porting the code to pure OCaml might prove the most interesting > task to me. I wonder what is the state of QT4 bindings, though: you > mentioned they were incomplete or non-nexistant, so is it possible to > overcome this without writing the whole QT4 bindings package? It also might > be a bit early to start porting, but then, if I start now, by the time I'd > have anything basic, you would probably complete most of the features > (considering that I have little practical experience with OCaml and no > experience with QT).
PyQt may be a good thing to look at, but I don't know how easy it would be to port PyQt to OCaml. The only language I found it easy to bind to almost any binary API is Lisp, since it can actually execute nontrivial programs at compilation time. I guess the starting point would be to look at Qt's C++ API and design an API for Qt in OCaml, and only then try to bridge the gap. Cheers, Kuba _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
