> Overall, I can't help seeing that any author who isn't known on this > list ends up with a questionable book -- first Smith and now Rentsch. > Perhaps the elders should form a book vetting committee?
Well, the power to decide is in the hands of publishers (initially) and customers (later). But I can assure you that reputable publishing houses like Springer, Cambridge University Press or MIT Press do sollicit opinions from academics like me and take them into account. Their area editors attend major conferences like Principles of Programming Languages and it's always a pleasure to chat with them. But there isn't much that can be done with less reputable publishers and self-publishing, as Alexy remarked. Coming back to the Hickey/Rentsch book(s), I feel deeply sad about the mess that is unfolding on this list. I proofread a draft of Jason Hickey's book, at his request, and found it very good and just what the OCaml community is still missing: a well-written, English-language book on Caml appropriate both as a reference and as teaching material. (I'm not criticizing the other books in english on OCaml -- thanks God they exist! -- just noting that they don't quite fit this exact purpose.) What we now have is lawsuit material... I sincerely hope some kind of agreement can still be found at this point. - Xavier Leroy _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
