I am not sure my answer is relevant, but here it is : The ratio (time needed to install&learn&use it) / (time saved) has to be interesting (close to zero).
For me, at the moment, this ratio is close to infinite. However, I do hope to use it someday. Cheers, Philippe On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Edgar Friendly <thelema...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems like batteries' adoption isn't quite as thorough as expected. > We in the batteries devel team would love to know why you don't use > batteries. Here's some of our guesses: > > 1) I *do* use batteries > 2) It's not 1.0 yet, I'll try it then > 3) It makes my executables too big > 4) It's too hard to install (dependencies, godi failures) > 5) It's difficult to compile against > 6) It doesn't work on my platform > 7) It uses camlp4 > 8) Other (please explain) > > Respond in public if appropriate, respond directly to me if you want. > Now's a good time to think about where batteries is going and how it's > getting there. > > E _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs