On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1...@gmail.com> wrote: > let rec
Do OCaml'er look at let rec more as being a message to the programmer, rather than the compiler, that the way I want to define this function is recursively so even if 'f' was previously bound you know which one I mean? Considering the language allows mutation, I feel like it is more for humans than the compiler, but of course, the compiler must be told, too. _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
