On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:59 PM, <florent.ouc...@imag.fr> wrote: > Martin Jambon <martin.jam...@ens-lyon.org> a écrit : >> >> I disagree. The syntax is a new and optional feature. Authors who want >> their >> new code to compile with an earlier version of OCaml should simply avoid >> using >> the new feature, as always. > > The 3.12 version number is just minor increment. It should keep backward > compatibility with the 3.x branch as much as possible.
I'm sorry but where do you see a violation of backward compatibility? Can you provide an example that compiles OK with Ocaml 3.11 and generates an error with Ocaml 3.12? - Dmitry Bely _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
