On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Gerd Stolpmann <i...@gerd-stolpmann.de>wrote:
> Am Montag, den 15.11.2010, 22:46 -0800 schrieb Edgar Friendly: > * As somebody mentioned "implicit parallelization": Don't expect > anything from this. Even if a good compiler finds ways to > parallelize 20% of the code (which would be a lot), the runtime > effect would be marginal. 80% of the code is run at normal speed > (hopefully) and dominates the runtime behavior. The point is > that such compiler-driven code improvements are only local > optimizations. For getting good parallelization results you need > to restructure the design of the program - well, maybe > compiler2.0 can do this at some time, but this is not in sight. > I think you are underestimating parallelizing compilers. -- Eray Ozkural, PhD candidate. Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ai-philosophy http://myspace.com/arizanesil http://myspace.com/malfunct
_______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
