Am Montag, den 22.11.2010, 15:21 +0200 schrieb Thanassis Tsiodras: > I apologize beforehand if this is not the forum to ask. > > I am on the fence about whether to learn OCaml or not, and while > reading an article called "Why OCaml" > (http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~murphyk/Software/Ocaml/why_ocaml.html), I saw > that OCaml was praised for the speed of the executables it generates - > and was referred to, speed-wise, as "second to none", except C and > C++. > > However, when I actually went to the Language Shootout page suggested > in the article, I found out that OCaml is not 2nd, it is 13th, behind > languages like Haskell and C#... > (http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u32/which-programming-languages-are-fastest.php) > > Is it just hype, then? Or am I missing something?
I think the shootout is not a good data source. There are definitely some very poor Ocaml results there, so I'd guess the shootout got recently more attention by enthusiasts of other languages, and the current Ocaml programs there are not very good. (I remember Ocaml was #1 at the shootout a few years ago, faster than C.) So maybe a good opportunity to post better Ocaml solutions there? Gerd -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gerd Stolpmann, Bad Nauheimer Str.3, 64289 Darmstadt,Germany g...@gerd-stolpmann.de http://www.gerd-stolpmann.de Phone: +49-6151-153855 Fax: +49-6151-997714 ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
