I can confirm that old code-snippets were removed (and that both faster solutions and environment variable tweaks were rejected).
On Nov 22, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Oliver Bandel wrote: > Zitat von "Gerd Stolpmann" <i...@gerd-stolpmann.de>: > [...] >> (I remember Ocaml was #1 >> at the shootout a few years ago, faster than C.) So maybe a good >> opportunity to post better Ocaml solutions there? > [...] > > Yes I also remember that. > I hope that the new OCaml compilers did not > make OCaml lessperformance by enhancing other features. > > And I don't realy think so. > > But were the old code-snippets emoved, or what was going on, > that OCaml degraded that much? > _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs