On 11/27/2010 11:31 AM, bluestorm wrote:
Reversing the specific 0-ary modification suggested by Alain is probably easier, as I suspect most users don't use that one much, but Alain probably makes use of it;
As I've been designated as the primary responsible for that uninspired change (I plead guilty), I guess it is my responsibility to state here that frankly, I don't give a damn. That said, enabling the warning by default sounds better to me than reverting the change or introducing a new syntax.
-- Alain _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
