mostly fftw using christophe troessler binding and a kind of plain convolution, actully very comparable to plain convolution 100% in caml (not using any c binding).
plus minor things like binary search, vector multiplications etc. (audio DSP). Le 3 déc. 2010 à 22:22, Jon Harrop a écrit : > Philippe wrote: >> I'm totally noob on compilers internals, but if the processing of float >> arrays can be improved a lot by a LLVM ocamlopt, I would use it >> exclusively. > > LLVM's x86 code gen will generate more efficient floating point code than > ocamlopt if and only if the type information is available to it. With > OCaml's current design, that is unlikely and you'll still have things like > the 16Mb limit. > > What algorithms are you running? > > Cheers, > Jon. _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
