Hello, On 07-12-2010, Alain Frisch <al...@frisch.fr> wrote: > On 12/07/2010 01:24 AM, Sylvain Le Gall wrote: >> Here is the list so far: >> 1. no build system setup : Martin who first did the packaging, didn't >> have included how to build ocaml/findlib neither the binaries itself. >> So basically you need to build by hand to generate the .msi. This is >> not a big issue but for a collective effort it is better to have a >> common way to build the binaries >> 2. some environment variables are not set and make ocaml crash (AFAIR, we >> doesn't set OCAMLIB) >> 3. we don't ship the graphical toplevel >> 4. I am still not sure how to deal with ActiveTCL + OCaml (because of the >> ActiveTCL license) >> 5. Total lack of documentation > > Do you plan to support ocamlopt? If yes, the users will have to install > a toolchain (at least, an assembler+linker). Mingw has the advantage of > producing binaries that depend only on msvcrt.dll (available on any > fresh Windows installation), not on a specific version of > msvcr80.dll/msvcr90.dll. But Windows users might prefer to install a > version of VS Express or a Windows SDK.
We will provide ocamlopt (32/64 bits). But indeed, the toolchain can be an issue (esp. masm). I plan to use VS2008. Maybe the native Lexifi's amd64/x86 backend is a better option. If we are able to use this backend, we still have to use a linker ? > > Not building labltk seems ok. As for the graphical toplevel, I think > there are some pending bugs (random crashes) with the current version > under recent versions of Windows, so it's probably better not to include > it. Some support for installing the emacs mode automatically and/or a > version of ledit would be useful replacements. > I didn't known this fact. This is another reason for not building labltk. Since I almost never use it, I don't think it will be a big loose. I will probably look for ledit (or lwt toplevel) which seems a better alternative to emacs (too heavy too install). Regards, Sylvain Le Gall _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs