ymmv, but keep in mind that in most cases the disk space cost of a permanode + claim is pretty neglectable compared to the space usage of the data itself. I "permafy" all of my pictures.
On 1 June 2016 at 15:27, Alok Parlikar <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah. Okay. I think I'm so far doing the right thing then. All my old data is > reachable from a permanode (top level node for each disk copied in). But I > won't be able to search pics or media until I make each of those permanodes, > but at the same time I don't really want to make my code archives and .git > files all show up unnecessarily.. maybe. :-) > > Maybe I can selectively permafy. Or perhaps I can go all permanode (which > would happen if I had been using fuse rw) and not care. > > Would be good to know what some of you have done so far :-) > > (phone) > > On 01-Jun-2016 18:41, "Mathieu Lonjaret" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Permanodes are the anchors that keep your data alive and visible, so >> yes, your files should usually be somehow reachable through a >> permanode. Although it's not always direct; e.g. there could be a >> permanode only for a directory (static-set), but no permanode for each >> of the files in that directory (the static-set entries). >> >> A rule of thumb to keep in mind for later: the garbage collector will >> start enumerating from the known roots and mark everything it can >> reach from there on. So if one of your files is not reachable through >> any schema relation (say as the camliContent of a permanode), it would >> not be marked, and would eventually be collected. Which is fair game >> since you wouldn't be able to find it back anyway. >> >> On 1 June 2016 at 01:51, Alok Parlikar <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Sorry I'm sending too many questions lately :-) >> > >> > I'm not quite sure which files I camput should, or should not be >> > permanodes. >> > >> > Should I import all my data with --filenodes and make everything >> > permanodes? >> > If so, when would I not create permanodes for something I camput? >> > >> > Alok >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "Camlistore" group. >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> > an >> > email to [email protected]. >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "Camlistore" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/camlistore/E_GI0140DG8/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Camlistore" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Camlistore" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
