Cyber-Colt .45

The Daily Reckoning

Ouzilly, France

Thursday, August 26, 2004

             ---------------------

*** Squanderville...when will the Asians own more of 
America than we do?

*** Laguna Beach...Lubbock, Texas...and a browbeaten 
husband...

*** Lucky Luciano...Wahhabism...bottled water...and more!

              --- Advertisement ---

Aug 29th Law Makes Insider Trading Legal

It�s no secret corporate executives make a fortune 
trading their own stock. Look at Myron Wentz, CEO of 
Usana Health Science. He made 2,533% trading his own 
stock. Or Patrick A. Hopf, who runs Select Comfort. 
He made 1,630% gains trading his shares. 

But now, thanks to a new law recently passed by Congress, 
these profits are now completely legal (and available), 
to you and me as regular investors. 

For details go to:
http://www.youreletters.com/t/50560/3785758/645202/0/

              ---------------------

We take it back: Maybe the Chinese aren't so dumb, after 
all.

"Reversion to the mean," our friend Tim Price reminded us 
earlier this week, is the fundamental rule of all 
investing. When things get out of whack, they tend to go 
back to where they tend to be, in other words.

Never before have trade deficits been more out of balance 
than they are now. The difference between what America 
imports and what the rest of the world - notably Asia - 
exports to her equals 2.5% of the entire world's GDP. 
America imports; Asia exports. America buys; Asia sells. 
America consumes; Asia produces. America spends money; Asia 
makes it. America squanders her fortune; Asia takes it up. 

Never before has any major nation been willing to ruin 
itself at such a rapid rate. This year alone, approximately 
$600 billion in U.S. assets will be transferred to foreign 
hands - mostly Asian. The most important of those assets 
are U.S. Treasury notes and bonds, which represent a claim 
against the nation. 

Treasurys are denominated in U.S. dollars - over which no 
one has more control than the United States itself. Since 
the custodians of the currency seemed hellbent on 
destroying the dollar, we naturally assumed that anyone who 
would take an IOU from the U.S. government, denominated in 
U.S. dollars...paying interest at a rate scarcely above the 
inflation rate...was a fool.

Of course, we always thought that the people issuing the 
Treasurys - thus squandering the wealth built up by 
generations of Americans - were even bigger fools. 

Now we revise our opinion of the foreigners...and redouble 
our bad opinion of ourselves. This year, for example, 
nearly a quarter of a trillion dollars worth of U.S. assets 
leaves America and finds a new home in China. Mostly U.S. 
Treasurys. If the dollar were to plummet or inflation rates 
to soar, the Chinese would be chagrined and annoyed. 

But the dollar shows few signs of imminent decline. What's 
more, instead of heading into an inflationary period, the 
entire world economy seems to be sinking. Growth rates are 
falling. The price of oil, after scaring everyone, is now 
dropping. Bonds are holding up quite well. Gold is stuck at 
$400. 

What if the world economy - led by the U.S. - really were 
slipping into a long, slow, soft decline, as Addison and I 
guessed in our (best-selling, riveting, delightful, 
insightful...choose your own adjective) book? Well, it 
would mean that the Chinese would have an opportunity to 
redeem their U.S. Treasurys at high prices...against more 
tangible U.S. assets - factories, buildings, land, gold, 
resources, farms - at low ones! 

Oh, those wily, inscrutable Asians! Soon they will own a 
big part of the United States. Warren Buffett complains 
about it already. "Squanderville," he calls us. At the 
present rate...it won't take many years before the Asians 
own more of America than we own...

But we Americans aren't so stupid. In exchange for our 
factories, companies, businesses, land, buildings and other 
productive assets, we will have gotten nifty DVD 
players...and those thin-screened TVs...and nice 
automobiles...

What delicious irony...what a marvelous comeuppance...what 
fitter "reversion" to a mean, mean world?! After buying 
Manhattan from the savages for trinkets...we now sell it to 
Asians - and get trinkets in return! Oh...we feel Nature's 
dagger deep in our own soft flesh. 

Dear reader...we have some advice. Learn to say "please" 
and "thank you" in Chinese. You may need it. [Ed. Note: See 
the irony for yourself. Come to China with Addison Wiggin! 
He's decided to take a select group of investors to meet 
with some of China's most innovative business leaders in 
November. Learn more about this trip...

The Trip of a Lifetime
http://www.agoratravel.com/china/dr/ ]

And now, the U.S.-based crew with more news:

              ---------------------

Eric Fry, reporting from the land of surf dudes and 
volleyball babes....

- Here in Laguna Beach, Calif., the brilliant sunshine 
glistens all day long off of the exotic cars that roll like 
glossy waves along Pacific Coast Highway. The same 
brilliant sunshine also illumines a postcard-perfect array 
of beach town scenes - tanned 20-something females playing 
volleyball, as well as swarthy 40-something males driving 
Ferrari convertibles. Laguna Beach is prosperity incarnate. 
No sign of economic distress is evident anywhere.

- But we would imagine that the folks here in this pretty 
Pacific hamlet are living just as far above their means - 
if not farther - than folks in Lubbock, Texas. And we would 
also imagine that Laguna residents are just as certain as 
Lubbock residents - if not more so - that home prices will 
continue rising. Lastly, we would imagine that folks here 
in the Golden State believe in "stocks for the long haul." 
In other words, if you strip away their perfect tans, 
flawless bodies and vegan diets, Laguna Beach residents are 
no different from most Americans.

- For the moment, the nation's universal faith in stocks 
for the long haul seems like a worthwhile belief. The stock 
market has bounced back very nicely from its midsummer 
swoon and seems ready and able to continue moving higher. 
The Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped 83 points 
yesterday, to 10,182, while the Nasdaq Composite rose 1.3%, 
to 1,861. We wouldn't want to quarrel with the stock 
market's recent success, but we suspect that the current 
rally is little more than an "oversold bounce." After a 
punishing July and early August, the stock market was more 
deserving of a break than a browbeaten husband. 

- The stock market's newfound vitality is no mystery; one 
need look no further than the oil market, where the price 
of crude oil is slumping. Falling oil prices mean falling 
price pressures throughout the economy, which mean strong 
stock prices...more or less. 

- Yesterday, crude for October delivery tumbled $1.66, to 
$43.55, while gasoline prices fell as much as 6% on the New 
York Mercantile Exchange. And once again, Wall Street 
analysts were falling all over one another to proclaim the 
end of the oil bull market. Maybe so; but we're still 
inclined to trust the oil market more than Wall Street 
analysts.

- In other words, the price of crude oil may well drop 
below $40 a barrel, but we suspect that it will not stay 
down there for long...so we should not be surprised if 
crude oil resumes its stunning advance, nor should we be 
surprised if stock prices resume their decline if/as/when 
oil mounts a new charge toward $50 a barrel.

- The stock market cannot always be as agreeable as a 
Laguna Beach day, especially not when the dark clouds of 
rising oil prices gather overhead.

              ---------------------

Bill Bonner, back in Ouzilly...

*** Herb Greenberg:

"Yes, the market could very well go higher in coming weeks, 
especially if there's any relief with oil prices.

"But it's just as likely to go lower - not just in coming 
weeks, but after the election, as well.

"Interest rates aren't going lower. (And if they are, we're 
really screwed.) They're going higher, but the same talking 
heads who reminded investors to follow the Fed when rates 
were falling are now finding every reason known to man to 
ignore their very own advice as rates are rising. 

"Inflation isn't going away, and it's worse than the 
government says. For example, the Bureau of Labor 
Statistics said that for the quarter ended in July, prices 
of food and beverages rose at a compounded annual rate of 
around 5- 5.5%. Yet Sysco, the big food distributor, says 
that inflation last quarter, "as measured by the rise in 
our cost of goods," was 8%.

"Here in San Diego, as housing prices continue to rise, the 
affordability index on housing is now at an all-time low of 
11%; that means only 11% of households here can afford to 
pay the $565,030 for a median-priced home. (This is going 
to end badly, I tell ya, badly! The house next door to me 
just sold for 20% more than I paid a year ago. But don't 
worry, it's not a bubble.)

"Then there's oil.

"It's really that simple."

*** And a Daily Reckoning reader:

"Regarding your theory about the stock market [that, over 
time, Wall Street is a capital destroyer...that the typical 
investor loses money, rather than make it], you perhaps 
have heard the story about Lucky Luciano (Richard Ney 
recounts one version of it in his book on the specialist).
 
"Around the time of his deportation to Italy, Lucky Luciano 
granted an interview in which he described a visit to the 
floor of the New York Stock Exchange. When the operations 
of floor specialists had been explained to him, he said he 
suddenly realized 'I'd joined the wrong mob.' (Other 
versions have it as 'I got into the wrong racket.')
 
*** And another reader:

"Your ranting and raving about our 'pre-emptive' war in 
Iraq is rather small minded. Yes, ostensibly we invaded 
Iraq under the guise of this policy but Wahhabism is the 
real threat to America's physical security, as well as to 
the oil supply of the region, and thus the world. We just 
can't say that directly without upsetting the billion or so 
Muslims in the world. We all must remember that the United 
States of America did not attack first. If South African 
criminals backed by an elaborate mafia came to Germany and 
murdered 3,000 people and the South African government did 
not cooperate to put a stop to the mafia, then I would say 
let the South Africans have at it. Your argument is weak 
and stupid.

"Most people know that our real intention is to secure 
bases in the Middle East to protect the world oil supplies 
as well as to pressure the Saudis to do something about the 
troublemakers in their kingdom. I have no problem with the 
USMC using radical Arabs for target practice. Besides, 
several justifications already existed before the invasion. 
First, Saddam violated every single UN resolution that came 
out of Gulf War I. Second, Saddam deserved what he got. 
Last, you could use the excuse of WMDs (which were probably 
transported to Syria and sit there now). The United States 
of America acted. That is something that would never happen 
under the auspices of the UN. 

"Furthermore, the French, Germans and Russians were too 
worried about losing out economically should the United 
States take over Iraq. That is the ONLY reason that we did 
not get NATO backing on this. Politics is a dirty game 
filled with chicanery on all sides. I was against what G.W. 
did at first, but now I have come to the conclusion to 
support his action in Iraq. My only concern is that it will 
probably bankrupt us."

*** And yet another reader:

"You're snobs, the whole bunch of you," Jules had charged. 

Well, Jules, I couldn't agree with you more. 

Wow, how has America survived all this time without the 
comments and helpful criticisms of the Bonner family? 

I was in Paris years ago on tour, and we were at a 
restaurant. One of the ladies in our group ordered water, 
and she was brought bottled water. She slammed the bottle 
down on the table and yelled, "I wanted WAAATER." I almost 
slid under the table in embarrassment and was truly ashamed 
at that moment to be an American. This was the way water 
was served in Paris, and I thought she had damned well 
better get used to it and keep her mouth shut. It is 
downright RUDE to question the culture of others. I was 
there to observe European culture and embrace the 
differences, not ridicule them.
 
And even though I would have loved a Denny's breakfast, I 
made do with my croissant and coffee and kept MY mouth 
shut.

[Editor's comment: Like, whatever.]

              --- Advertisement ---

Little-Known Canadian Investment Gets Money Flowing in like Niagara Falls 

You won't find them in America -- yet they're making some Americans very 
rich (not to mention lots of Canadians). They're Canadian income trusts, 
which give you the most gratifying return you can imagine -- cash now. 
Annual yields are running as high as 15 per cent! 

Why are so many Canadian companies willing to divert their cash flow 
back to investors? How can you get in on the bonanza? 

To see how income trusts can bring you a steady stream of cash click on 
the link below: 

http://www.usinvestmentreporter.com

              ---------------------

The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: We have a real treat in store 
for you today, dear reader. An exclusive! An alternative-
media revolution has transformed America in the last half 
century...Washington insider Richard Viguerie explores a 
menage a trois with Mike Drudge, Hillary Clinton and Monica 
Lewinsky as the principals... 

CYBER-COLT .45
by Richard A. Viguerie


On January 17, 1998, the Internet made its debut as a 
world-shaking tool of political communication. That was the 
day Matt Drudge used his Web site to introduce Monica 
Lewinsky to the world as the White House lover of President 
Bill Clinton. Drudge's expose started a chain of events 
that culminated in the president's impeachment, and in the 
process, he placed the spotlight on an irrevocable change 
in the balance of power between the ordinary citizen and 
the political establishment.

Monica wasn't the beginning of the Internet's involvement 
in politics, by any means. Drudge himself had been covering 
all the Clinton scandals for four years. Jim Robinson's 
FreeRepublic.com was the leading right-wing political site 
on the Web, and in 1997, Joseph and Elizabeth Farah started 
WorldNetDaily, the first independent newspaper on the Web. 
But in 1998, the Internet was just beginning to penetrate 
mainstream America, and print media - notably The American 
Spectator - had been getting most of the spotlight for 
Clinton exposes. Monica changed all that. 

Drudge grew up in Takoma Park, Md., a politically far-left 
suburb of Washington, D.C., also known as "the People's 
Republic of Takoma Park." He graduated 325th in his high 
school class of 350, but loved current events and was 
hooked on talk radio. "What a great place, Washington, 
D.C., to grow up in," he later reminisced. "I used to walk 
these streets as an aimless teen, young adult, walk by ABC 
News over on DeSales, daydream; stare up at The Washington 
Post newsroom over on 15th Street, look up longingly, 
knowing I'd never get in..."

Instead, he headed west to Hollywood and became manager of 
the gift shop at CBS Studios. He volunteered in the 
mailroom from time to time. "I hit pay dirt when I 
discovered that the trash cans in the Xerox room at 
Television City were stuffed each morning with overnight 
Nielsen ratings, information gold." He sensed the thrill of 
a scoop, but didn't know what to do with his inside 
knowledge.

Then his father bought him a computer, hoping it might 
spark a desire for a more promising career. Matt was a 
quick learn, and within two months he was posting his 
gossipy scoops on Usenet and AOL and doing some writing for 
Wired magazine. "I collected a few e-mail addresses of 
interest," he later recalled. "People had suggested I start 
a mailing list, so I collected the e-mails and set up a 
list called 'The Drudge Report.' One reader turned into 
five, then turned into 100. And faster than you could say 
'I never had sex with that woman' it was 1,000 - 5,000 - 
100,000 people. The ensuing Web site practically launched 
itself."

"Lewinsky almost fell through the cracks," says Drudge. "It 
was a stray e-mail that came in. You just go for it." The 
results were far beyond anything he expected. "I had 
something like 400,000 visits that Saturday when that thing 
broke." For three days he had the story to himself, and the 
whole world was clicking in. "I barricaded myself in the 
apartment. I was terrified, because from my Hollywood 
apartment, a story of this magnitude was being born. I 
remember I teared up when I hit the 'Enter' button on that 
one that night, because I said, 'My life won't be the same 
after this.' And it turned out to be right." Then Rush 
Limbaugh read his entire reports over the air; and then 
finally the establishment media acknowledged the story, 
which they had known about for weeks but had hushed up.

Speaking at the National Press Club a few months later, 
Drudge asked both himself and all those credentialed 
reporters listening to him, "How did a story like Monica 
Lewinsky break out of a Hollywood apartment? What does that 
say about the Washington press corps? It just baffles me. I 
haven't come up with answers on that."

Throughout this book, we have shown how the new and 
alternative media empower the individual citizen by 
bypassing the gatekeepers of the media establishment, those 
editors and news anchors who want to decide exactly what 
news you should be allowed to read or hear or see. Direct 
mail, the fax machine, talk radio, cable television - each 
has given you stories and viewpoints you never would have 
gotten from Dan Rather or The New York Times. 

These new and alternative media have also given you new 
ways to communicate your wishes directly to other citizens 
and the politicians who are supposed to represent you, 
again by bypassing the gatekeepers. In this case, the 
gatekeeper may be a union chief who wants Congress to 
believe all union members think alike on a piece of 
legislation, when you know it isn't true. Or a Republican 
lobbyist who wants the Congress to cave in on an issue you 
consider critical. Thanks to the new and alternative media, 
you now have ways to be heard.

None of these new and alternative media, however, empower 
you directly, as an individual, quite as effectively and 
forcefully as the Internet does. Your modem is your 
equalizer, your cyber-Colt .45. You have a direct line, 
with no intermediaries or filters, to any publication or 
Web site around the world, to other citizens who share your 
interests and viewpoints, to government bureaucrats, to 
your political representatives, to the stores you want to 
do business with, to people who want to buy something 
you're trying to unload - you name it.

It is to Matt Drudge's credit that he fully understands all 
this - the Big Picture beyond his own Web site. He probably 
sensed it from the moment he sat down in front of that 
keyboard and monitor his dad bought him. To see how fully 
he comprehends this, take a look at his address before the 
National Press Club on June 2, 1998, and his sharp answers 
to the contemptuous questions presented to him afterward. 

"What's going on here?" he asked rhetorically. "Well, 
clearly there is a hunger for unedited information, absent 
corporate considerations." Zap! Right off the top he slams 
the ball back at all those reporters facing him, who, with 
all their credentials and college degrees and corporate 
conglomerate bosses, let this gift shop clerk in Hollywood 
scoop them on the biggest story of the decade.

"We have entered an era vibrating with the din of small 
voices," he continued. "Every citizen can be a reporter, 
can take on the powers that be. The difference between the 
Internet [and] television and radio, magazines, newspapers 
is the two-way communication. The Net gives as much voice 
to a 31-year-old computer geek like me as to a CEO or 
speaker of the house. We all become equal."

"And you would be amazed what the ordinary guy knows," he 
added.

Then he rubbed their noses in it, citing major stories 
other than Monica that he broke in The Drudge Report. And 
all the links on his Web site - another great innovation of 
the Internet era: "This marks the first time that an 
individual has access to the news wires outside of the 
newsroom. You get to read all the news from The Associated 
Press, UPI, Reuters, to the more arcane Agence France-
Presse and the Xinhua. I'm a personal fan of the Xinhua."

Drudge continued: 

"And time was only newsrooms had access to the full 
pictures of the day's events, but now any citizen does. We 
get to see the kinds of cuts that are made for all kinds of 
reasons, endless layers of editors with endless agendas 
changing bits and pieces, so by the time the newspaper hits 
your welcome mat, it had no meaning. Now, with a modem, 
anyone can follow the world and report on the world - no 
middle man, no big brother." 

(Later interviewed by WorldNetDaily's Geoff Metcalf, Drudge 
asserted, "We don't need the gatekeepers: the Ted Koppels, 
the Peter Jennings, the Dan Rathers, Tom Brokaw. They're 
all the same anyway...you don't need these gatekeepers in 
Washington, who are basically just feeding off each other 
and bouncing things off of each other.")

Drudge acknowledges that each new medium scares the devil 
out of the old media. But, he assured his National Press 
Club audience, "The Internet is going to save the news 
business. I envision a future where there'll be 300 million 
reporters, where anyone from anywhere can report for any 
reason. It's freedom of participation absolutely realized."

It's not just the media-establishment types who worry about 
the lack of gatekeepers in the new media. That worries 
members of the political establishment, too. The new media 
jeopardize their cozy arrangement with reporters who know 
their place.

Speaking to the Wednesday Morning Club in Los Angeles, a 
series of talks arranged by David Horowitz, Drudge told how 
he tried to remain civil with first lady Hillary Clinton, 
to no avail: "I tipped my hat to her at the White House 
Correspondents Dinner a couple of months ago and got quite 
a dirty look."

One of Hillary Clinton's functions as co-president was to 
handle the White House Millennium Project. At a press 
briefing on the Millennium Project, she was asked her 
opinions about the Internet, and she came across as far 
less enthusiastic than, say, the vice president at that 
time.

Stumbling for words at times, she rambled on about how "We 
are all going to have to rethink how we deal with this," 
whatever that means. "As exciting as these new developments 
[the Internet] are...there are a number of serious issues 
without any kind of editing function or gate keeping 
function...['I wonder who she was referring to,' Drudge 
quipped.] I mean, it is just beyond imagination what can be 
disseminated. So I think we're going to have to really 
worry about this..."

"Sounds like you favor regulation," someone asked.

"I don't know what I'm in favor of," she replied. 
(Actually, her actions as first lady tell us a lot about 
what she'd like to do with the Internet.)

The first lady continued: "I don't have any idea what we're 
going to do legally, regulatorily, technologically - I 
don't have a clue. But I do think we always have to keep 
competing interests in balance...anytime an individual or 
an institution or an invention leaps so far out ahead of 
that balance and throws a system, whatever it might be - 
political, economic, technological - out of balance, you've 
got a problem...[and] it can lead to all kinds of bad 
outcomes..."

To this amazing example of Ludditism, Matt Drudge 
responded: "Would she have said the same thing about Ben 
Franklin or Thomas Edison or Henry Ford or Einstein? They 
all leapt so far ahead out that they shook the balance. No, 
I say to these people, faster, not slower. Create. Let your 
mind flow. Let the imagination take over. And if technology 
has finally caught up with individual liberty, why would 
anyone who loves freedom want to rethink that?"

Summing up their opposite reactions to the Internet, Drudge 
avowed: "The first lady says we need to rethink it. I say 
we need to embrace it."

Regards,

Richard A. Viguerie
for The Daily Reckoning

Editor's Note: Richard A. Viguerie is a Washington insider 
with impeccable credentials. He started the conservatives' 
alternative media revolution in the 1960s and '70s, and is 
credited by liberals and conservatives alike for 
transforming American politics.

The essay you have just read, "Cyber-Colt .45," was taken 
from Richard Viguerie's latest book, America's Right Turn, 
a lively and insightful explanation of exactly how 
conservatives used alternative media to take power and what 
is likely to happen next. 

To learn more about the political, ideological and media 
battles ahead, see here:

America's Right Turn
http://www.rightturn.us/agora.htm

              --- Advertisement ---

"If I Don't Kill You, I'll Pay You One Dollar Each Second"

So said the greatest American military tactician of modern times.  

A Korean war veteran turned Air Force flight instructor, he would bet his 
students that he could "kill" them in a mock dogfight within 40 seconds of 
starting in a position of disadvantage.

Legend has it, he never lost.  Here's how you can employ his dogfight strategy 
in precision options plays for gains of 135%, 164%, and 120% in as little as 2 weeks...

http://www.youreletters.com/t/50560/3785758/645203/0/

------------------------------------------------------
The Daily Reckoning is a free, daily e-mail service
brought to you by the authors of the NY Times Business
Bestseller "Financial Reckoning Day".

To learn more or subscribe, see:
http://www.dailyreckoning.com

------------------------------------------------------

MAKE YOUR OPINIONS COUNT! Visit our Discussion Board:

http://www.agora-inc.com/forums/index.cfm?cfapp=3

Our writers and contributors also welcome your questions
and comments. Simply reply to this e-mail with the word
'Question' or 'Comment' in the Subject of your reply.

------------------------------------------------------
If you'd like, please forward this issue of the Daily
Reckoning to a friend.
------------------------------------------------------

Are you having trouble receiving your Daily Reckoning?
You can ensure its arrival in your mailbox here:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/whitelist.cfm

------------------------------------------------------
Please note: We sent this e-mail to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
because you or someone using your e-mail address subscribed
to this service.

Want to cancel? Use this:

http://www.youreletters.com/u?id=3785758B&u=http://www.dailyreckoning.com&l=dr

Address Change?  Use this:

http://www.agoramail.net/changeEmail.cfm?id=3785758

To cancel by mail or for any other subscription issues,
write us at:

    Order Processing Center
    Attn: Customer Service
    P.O. Box 925
    Frederick, MD 21705 USA



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/BCfwlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kumpulan/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to