I don't think I understand you well enough to answer. Do you have an example of what appears to be global conceptual duplication?
Kent Beck Three Rivers Institute > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilja Preuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 6:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [XP] What Does Evolutionary Design mean to you? > > > > Ron Jeffries wrote: > > > To what extent do local actions such as removal of duplication and > > good naming produce globally good design? > > A problem we currently have with a part of our system is that > (due to missed opportunities for refactoring earlier in the > project, and probably a missing metaphor) there seems to be > some kind of rather > *global* "conceptual" duplication. I'm not sure wether there > is a way to improve substantially in that situation by local > refactorings. With other words, the design space feels too > flat to have an idea of the direction to best refactor towards... > > Any ideas? > > Cheers, Ilja To Post a message, send it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ad-free courtesy of objectmentor.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/extremeprogramming/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
