I vote revert. This is just sinatra - I feel it's important camping maintains the cleanliness and clarity of functionality given to us by using simple classes. It's something we have which AFAIK no other ruby web framework does - you know exactly how it works, because it's just a class.
On 26/08/2011, at 7:21 AM, Magnus Holm wrote: > On Aug 25, 2011 10:54 PM, "John Beppu" <john.be...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If I wanted that notation, I'd just use Sinatra. ;) > > > > Like Bartosz, I like having named controllers so that I can pass them to > > R() when generating links. > > Does it make it better that you can name them too? > > Index = get "/" do > ... > end > > Sent from my iCampingPhone > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > Camping-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
_______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
