Brian Holt wrote:
> "Ron Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Brian Holt wrote:
>>> "tiamiboat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>>> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>  >
<snip>
> I did read your post, but Debbie said she was getting 4 Amps at
> times. If on a sunny day like today and today we have had more than
> 12 hrs sun,this stayed at 4 Amp then she would get more than 36 Ah
> regardless of what the rating of the cell is. But maybe her ammeter
> is duff, she had drunk to much red wine, the ammeter was made by the
> same company that made my car speedo, who knows, but anyway I would
> expect this to decrease exponentially (I Think) as the batteries
> charge up so to get them fully charged using just the solar cells is
> probably an awful long way off (Tech. term infinity)


4 amps seems chirpy to me - the panel is rated at 56Wp - i.e. 56 W when the
sun is at the highest - with the passage of the sun through the sky, I would
naturally assume something like a sine wave output with zero as the sun hit
the horizon and 56 W at 1pm BST - therefore I would guess that the best
charge is only obtained, say, 2-3h each side of the peak.  I'm sure the
manufacturers know better than our guesstimates...  otherwise, why quote a
daily output that you think is incorrect...


Ron Jones
Process Safety & Development Specialist
Don't repeat history, see unreported near misses in chemical lab/plant
at http://www.crhf.org.uk
Only two things are certain: The universe and human stupidity; and I'm
not certain about the universe. ~ Albert Einstein




SPONSORED LINKS
Sports fund raising Sports psychology degree Sport psychology college
Sport psychology course Sport nutrition Outdoor recreation


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to