[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Excuse the crude graphics, but hopefully this will explain how Steve's 
> idea would work.  Best viewed in a fixed pitch font!
> 
>        |                |
>        |                |
>                        /
>   ___|__              /__|___
>      |               /   |
>      |    __________/    |
>      |                    |
>      |                    |
>      |                    |
>       --------------------
> Caisson, sat on bottom of canal, water level in caisson same as outside.
> Boat in caisson and caisson doors shut.
>      | |                | |
>      | |                | |
>   ___|                 / |___
>      |                /  |
>      |               /   |
>      |    __________/    |
>       --------------------
> 
> Pump water OUT of the caisson, caisson floats higher in the water, but 
> the boat sinks to bottom of caisson, overall height above water level 
> reduced.

Afraid not!

For every inch of water pumped out, the boat will drop one inch lower relative 
to the caisson. But for every inch of water pumped out, the caisson will also 
rise one inch higher in the canal. So the level of the top of the boat relative 
to the tunnel stays constant.

This assumes that the sides of the caisson are thin enough that the outside and 
inside dimensions can be considered to be equal.

If, however, you built it with very thick walls, such that the area of the 
inside of the caisson was (say) only half of the area of the outside, then it 
would only rise one inch for every two inches of water pumped out. But this 
would require the outside dimensions of the caisson to be either much wider 
than the boat (difficult in Froghall) or much longer (which might make the 
bends at either end of the tunnel tricky).

Taking this one stage further (as mentioned in somebody else's posting), if you 
make the outdside of the caisson either much longer or wider than the inside, 
you can incorporate flotation chambers into the ends or sides (and ballast the 
vessel as necessary to counter their effect), so that the water was pumped into 
these rather then into the canal, and the caisson doesn't rise or sink at all. 
That was the plan for a vessel of this type proposed for getting barges under 
low bridges across the river in St Petersburg (probably still Leningrad in 
those days) without holding up the road traffic by opening the bridges. I don't 
think it was ever built.

A neat solution, but I'm not sure it's the right one for Froghall. 

Martin L



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/canals-list/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to