Dave Wedd wrote:
> Just received this - very little time to put in our comments!
> 

Done....


Will Chapman
> 
> http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/GenerateContent?CONTENT_ITEM_ID=67548&CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE=0&MENU_ID=12189
> 
> Planning application S/07902/06/OUT
> The above is the link that can be pasted into the internet bit so as to have 
> the page to respond to Birmingham Planning Applications.
> It may be some years away, but volunteers had hoped that the Dudley Number 2 
> canal in Selly Oak Park might be connected to the Worcester and Birmingham 
> Canal.  The trouble is, British Waterways chap (now left) thought that this 
> was guaranteed - but the agents for Sainsbury think it is nothing to do with 
> them.
> Result is that there is no one building a bridge to suit taking the canal 
> under the new huge complicated road layout.
> All the Birmingham UDP stresses is having the old canal protected as a 
> walking route.
> 
> If you want to do something, the Council must put the roads in at levels that 
> allow a bridge sometime in the future. If the road levels go in wrong, no 
> canal EVER.
> 
> Planning application S/07902/06/OUT
> 
> Please forward as Closing Date is 7 Feb
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 



Will Chapman
Save Our Waterways
www.SaveOurWaterways.org.uk

Reply via email to