[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>In a message dated 27/03/2007 10:02:39 GMT Daylight Time,  
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>The  legend on the library wall 'Spelthorne' led me to remark not 30 mins. 
>ago  "What's the difference between "Spelt" & "Spelled?"
>'Spelt' is the English form of the past tense of 'to spell'
> 
>'Spelled' is American English, although it is beginning to pollute  real 
>English as well.

Or, "'Spelt' is an archaic spelling, now seldom used; see also
'shoppe'"
> 
>DaveD
> 
>PS Why is the opposite of 'flammable' not 'inflammable'?    ;-)

The two opposites here used to be "inflammable" and "non-inflammable",
but this was causing hazards due to the confusion that they generated,
so the safety folk campaigned successfuly for them to be replaced by
"flammable" and "non-flammable".

Adrian

Adrian Stott
07956-299966

Reply via email to