>Richard wrote: >> If I could persuade more people to choose the size that's right for >them, rather than flocking, >> sheep-like, to 58ft/60ft, I'd be a very happy (and shiny) editor. > >Baaa, that's a very controversial statement Richard from the editor of >our premier waterways mag! Baaa, baaa. Or is it just an example of >woolly thinking? ;-)))) >Roger >nb NowwhwereismysubscriptiontoWW? ;-)
Now look what you have done Callum. We are having all the menfolk arguing about size. Repeat after me - size doesn't matter, it's what you do with it that matters! Sue nb Nackered Navvy
